Through the real cases of euthanasia in New Zealand, both of “for” and “against” for euthanasia can be revealed.
Tuesday, 24 August 2010
Introduction
What is euthanasia?
Euthanasia refers to the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. In other word, to avoid a physical and emotional pain, the date of ending a life can be decided by a person who wished to die.
Many different forms of euthanasia can be distinguished as the following;
- Active euthanasia : a person has a direct involvement with the person’s death. (eg) overdose of medicine
- Passive euthanasia : a person has an indirect involvement with the person’s death.
(Withdrawing treatment : power off a machine, so the person can’t keep the life.
Withholding treatment : No more surgery to extend the life.)
- Voluntary euthanasia : it can be occurred by the request of the person who dies.
- Involuntary euthanasia : for the person, like a young baby or unconscious person, an appropriate person can make a right decision of living or dying
- Doctrine of double effect : to reduce the patient’s pain(effect), the doctor aims for speeding the patient’s death(effect), but not aims to kill the patient.
- DNR(Do Not Resuscitate) : it’s a kind of the passive euthanasia. When a patient’s heart stops, a doctor is not required to resuscitate.
- Assisted suicide : a person who wants to die, asks for help, such as leaving the drug near him/her.
Surprisingly, euthanasia is legalised in only a few countries. Historically euthanasia started since BC400, and physician-assisted euthanasia can be practiced legally in the State of Oregon, the US. In 1996 and 1997, voluntary enthanasia was allowed by Law in the Northern Territory of Australia, and as of August 2003 voluntary euthanasia is legal in two countries – the Netherlands and Belgium. Despite a lot of debate, the legalisation of euthanasia still seems to be in process around the world. Currently in New Zealand, medical treatment might be rejected under a clause in the Bill of Rights Act 1990. This means passive euthanasia is legally acceptables, whereas active euthanasia is still illegal in New Zealand so heavy penalties will be given to a person who involves in any way assisting suicide.
If so, what do other New Zealand organisations have views on euthanasia? By the report of parliament NZ, The Church of England and Catholic Church, Hospice NZ, The Medical Council of NZ, and The NZ Medical Association basically are not supporting euthanasia or not giving clear opinion on moral issues. This is a quite different result in other surveys. On this point, the question why NZ organisations and public survey have a disagreement is generated.
Many different forms of euthanasia can be distinguished as the following;
- Active euthanasia : a person has a direct involvement with the person’s death. (eg) overdose of medicine
- Passive euthanasia : a person has an indirect involvement with the person’s death.
(Withdrawing treatment : power off a machine, so the person can’t keep the life.
Withholding treatment : No more surgery to extend the life.)
- Voluntary euthanasia : it can be occurred by the request of the person who dies.
- Involuntary euthanasia : for the person, like a young baby or unconscious person, an appropriate person can make a right decision of living or dying
- Doctrine of double effect : to reduce the patient’s pain(effect), the doctor aims for speeding the patient’s death(effect), but not aims to kill the patient.
- DNR(Do Not Resuscitate) : it’s a kind of the passive euthanasia. When a patient’s heart stops, a doctor is not required to resuscitate.
- Assisted suicide : a person who wants to die, asks for help, such as leaving the drug near him/her.
Surprisingly, euthanasia is legalised in only a few countries. Historically euthanasia started since BC400, and physician-assisted euthanasia can be practiced legally in the State of Oregon, the US. In 1996 and 1997, voluntary enthanasia was allowed by Law in the Northern Territory of Australia, and as of August 2003 voluntary euthanasia is legal in two countries – the Netherlands and Belgium. Despite a lot of debate, the legalisation of euthanasia still seems to be in process around the world. Currently in New Zealand, medical treatment might be rejected under a clause in the Bill of Rights Act 1990. This means passive euthanasia is legally acceptables, whereas active euthanasia is still illegal in New Zealand so heavy penalties will be given to a person who involves in any way assisting suicide.
If so, what do other New Zealand organisations have views on euthanasia? By the report of parliament NZ, The Church of England and Catholic Church, Hospice NZ, The Medical Council of NZ, and The NZ Medical Association basically are not supporting euthanasia or not giving clear opinion on moral issues. This is a quite different result in other surveys. On this point, the question why NZ organisations and public survey have a disagreement is generated.
The cases in New Zealand
In New Zealand, a number of real cases were reported about euthanasia and it was a controversial issue. If three cases are introduced, first of all, Sean Davison’s case in 2009. At 84, Patricia Davison, a former GP and psychiatrist had multiple cancers so she tried to end her life by going on a 35 day hunger strike but she survived. Then she finally died in 2006, her son by her side. In 2009 Sean Davison, Patricia’s son published the book and he admitted that he gave his mother a lethal overdose of morphine. This case has been investigated by Dunedin police.
Secondly, Ian Crutchley was convicted of attempted murder in 2008. He assisted his 77 year old mother Elsie to die by giving a lethal dose of morphine. He sentenced to 6 months, community detention and 150 hours, community service. Lastly, in 1999 Lesley Martin’s case. Lesley Martin, a former nurse from Wanganui gave her mother an overdose of morphine and smothered her with a pillow to release her from painful cancer complications. Found guilty of attempted murder, she served half of her 15-month sentence in 2004.
The above cases have the common things. The parent was old and sick, and they were assisted to die by daughter or son, and their daughters or sons did not have guilt feeling what they had done but they were glad to let their parent be in peace, they, however, had to be convicted by the Law.
Secondly, Ian Crutchley was convicted of attempted murder in 2008. He assisted his 77 year old mother Elsie to die by giving a lethal dose of morphine. He sentenced to 6 months, community detention and 150 hours, community service. The above cases have the common things. The parent was old and sick, and they were assisted to die by daughter or son, and their daughters or sons did not have guilt feeling what they had done but they were glad to let their parent be in peace, they, however, had to be convicted by the Law.
"against" & "for" Euthanasia
There are the different views of euthanasia, one is ‘against’, the other is ‘for’.
On the other hand, people think that it is inevitable to legalise of euthanasia. Ironically, even if the opponents suggested some solution, such as training doctors for pain or a palliative care, a number of people tried to suicide eventually and most of their trials were failed. They needed someone's help to die. However, under the conditions of illegal euthanasia, it is not easy either ways asking for help or helping a person’s death. Most of people prefer ending of the life to the prolonged life in pain.
Furthermore, Voluntary Euthanasia Society gave their view about opponents’ misunderstanding. Firstly, unlike opponents’ concern, the society takes care of the old and the incurable sick with their best, not trying to remove them brutally. In addition, opponents think euthanasia can be processed unwillingly, but to avoid any kind of abuse or being taken advantage the society introduced a certain procedures. They believe that euthanasia is necessary for the person who is in meaningless and hopeless pain.
To begin with “against” of euthanasia, negative results are produced in euthanasia. There is an increasing rate of the crime against a sick and old people; For instance, two women who were charged guilty of manslaughter and being an accessory to manslaughter in 2008. They were the partner and friend of Graham Wiley who had Alzheimer’s disease. He was murdered by the veterinary sedative Nembutal, a well-known euthanasia drug, as soon as he changed his will. Like this case, Euthanasia opponents were concerned about intentional abuse by family or close friends, and the risk which might happen by doctors and psychologists’ mistakes. Unfortunately, the problem is that nobody knows what exactly happened except the surviving person. In addition, there are the alternatives to prevent the legalisation of euthanasia. According to the opinion of Brendan Malone from Catholic organization Family Life International, training doctors for specialised pain or development of a medicine for pain, would be better than the legalisation of euthanasia. Also, he agreed that the fact that people died in stress was not fair; yet, euthanasia was not the solution but he argued that the management of the palliative care was more appropriate.
On the other hand, people think that it is inevitable to legalise of euthanasia. Ironically, even if the opponents suggested some solution, such as training doctors for pain or a palliative care, a number of people tried to suicide eventually and most of their trials were failed. They needed someone's help to die. However, under the conditions of illegal euthanasia, it is not easy either ways asking for help or helping a person’s death. Most of people prefer ending of the life to the prolonged life in pain.
Furthermore, Voluntary Euthanasia Society gave their view about opponents’ misunderstanding. Firstly, unlike opponents’ concern, the society takes care of the old and the incurable sick with their best, not trying to remove them brutally. In addition, opponents think euthanasia can be processed unwillingly, but to avoid any kind of abuse or being taken advantage the society introduced a certain procedures. They believe that euthanasia is necessary for the person who is in meaningless and hopeless pain.
Conclusion
The decision about the issue of euthanasia is not easy as the other issues such as gays, smacking and abortion. To summarise, the projects in which the patients or the elder’s pain can be minimised during having a time with family or friends are organised and the environments which is preferred natural death to euthanasia are provided by the government. These ways can reduce the requesting of euthanasia. Nevertheless, the euthanasia should basically be allowed to the patients or the elders who is suffering from the painful disease by their own requesting, because the situation that family members or doctors are prosecuted as the murderer to help their suffering people must be avoided.
Now what is your decision?
References
BBC, Forms of Euthanasia, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From BBC of UK, Web Site http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/euthanasia/overview/forms.shtml
Euthanasia.com, History of Euthanasia, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From http://www.euthanasia.com/historyeuthanasia.html
NZ Herald, Detectives investigate ‘I killed mum’ claim, Retrieved 18 August, 2010, From http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10582739
NZ Herald, Euthanasia: The debate that won’t die, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10662800
NZ Herald, Pleading case for death with dignity, Retrieved 21 August, 2010, From
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10576841
NZ Herald, Son avoids jail for overdose, Retrieved 18 August, 2010, From http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10520853
Parliament New Zealand, Voluntary Euthanasia and New Zealand, Retrieved 20 August, 2010, From http://www.parliament.nz/NR/rdonlyres/1CA87108-6437-49DC-8BD1-4A1565A3A3F2/328/0307VoluntaryEuthanasia1.pdf
Voluntary Euthanasia Society of New Zealand, Poll Results, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From http://www.ves.org.nz/polls.php
Voluntary Euthanasia Society of New Zealand, The Law in New Zealand, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From http://www.ves.org.nz/law.php
Wikipedia-The free Encyclopedia, Euthanasia, Retrieved 23 August, 2010, From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia
Euthanasia.com, History of Euthanasia, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From http://www.euthanasia.com/historyeuthanasia.html
NZ Herald, Detectives investigate ‘I killed mum’ claim, Retrieved 18 August, 2010, From http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10582739
NZ Herald, Euthanasia: The debate that won’t die, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10662800
NZ Herald, Pleading case for death with dignity, Retrieved 21 August, 2010, From
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10576841
NZ Herald, Son avoids jail for overdose, Retrieved 18 August, 2010, From http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10520853
Parliament New Zealand, Voluntary Euthanasia and New Zealand, Retrieved 20 August, 2010, From http://www.parliament.nz/NR/rdonlyres/1CA87108-6437-49DC-8BD1-4A1565A3A3F2/328/0307VoluntaryEuthanasia1.pdf
Voluntary Euthanasia Society of New Zealand, Poll Results, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From http://www.ves.org.nz/polls.php
Voluntary Euthanasia Society of New Zealand, The Law in New Zealand, Retrieved 17 August, 2010, From http://www.ves.org.nz/law.php
Wikipedia-The free Encyclopedia, Euthanasia, Retrieved 23 August, 2010, From
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


