To begin with “against” of euthanasia, negative results are produced in euthanasia. There is an increasing rate of the crime against a sick and old people; For instance, two women who were charged guilty of manslaughter and being an accessory to manslaughter in 2008. They were the partner and friend of Graham Wiley who had Alzheimer’s disease. He was murdered by the veterinary sedative Nembutal, a well-known euthanasia drug, as soon as he changed his will. Like this case, Euthanasia opponents were concerned about intentional abuse by family or close friends, and the risk which might happen by doctors and psychologists’ mistakes. Unfortunately, the problem is that nobody knows what exactly happened except the surviving person. In addition, there are the alternatives to prevent the legalisation of euthanasia. According to the opinion of Brendan Malone from Catholic organization Family Life International, training doctors for specialised pain or development of a medicine for pain, would be better than the legalisation of euthanasia. Also, he agreed that the fact that people died in stress was not fair; yet, euthanasia was not the solution but he argued that the management of the palliative care was more appropriate.
On the other hand, people think that it is inevitable to legalise of euthanasia. Ironically, even if the opponents suggested some solution, such as training doctors for pain or a palliative care, a number of people tried to suicide eventually and most of their trials were failed. They needed someone's help to die. However, under the conditions of illegal euthanasia, it is not easy either ways asking for help or helping a person’s death. Most of people prefer ending of the life to the prolonged life in pain.
Furthermore, Voluntary Euthanasia Society gave their view about opponents’ misunderstanding. Firstly, unlike opponents’ concern, the society takes care of the old and the incurable sick with their best, not trying to remove them brutally. In addition, opponents think euthanasia can be processed unwillingly, but to avoid any kind of abuse or being taken advantage the society introduced a certain procedures. They believe that euthanasia is necessary for the person who is in meaningless and hopeless pain.

Hey Katie:)
ReplyDeleteFirst of all I think it's great that you picked a controversial subject.Well done:)
Your pros and cons regarding Euthanasia are very clear and the entire piece is very well written.
My only advice is to perhaps adjust the picture so the text becomes more visible?
Thanks for your advice. I noticed the picture covered one line of the text, but I couldn't adjust the size of the picture.
ReplyDeleteNow I removed that picture, it's not necessary. XD
Personally, I agree with Euthanasia for myself, I don't wanna suffer so much pain until the end, but it just right now thinking.maybe in the future i will change my mind. For others, I have no right to persuade or execute the job without their will, especially for family members, we know their feel, but morally we have to support them and give them enough strength to get through it rather than let them go.Even they're eager to.Oh, it reminds me something,errrr..I can't move further.
ReplyDelete